What must an officer do if feasible before using deadly force on a fleeing suspect?

Before using deadly force on a fleeing suspect, the officer must take necessary steps to avoid such extreme measures whenever possible. One of these steps involves warning the suspect, which serves multiple purposes. It provides the individual with an opportunity to surrender peacefully and can help de-escalate the situation. By issuing a warning, the officer demonstrates that they are giving the suspect a chance to comply with lawful directives rather than resorting to lethal force. This aligns with the protocols and training surrounding the use of force, which emphasize the importance of proportionality and the necessity of exhausting all other options before resorting to deadly force.

The other choices, while potentially relevant in the broader context of law enforcement practices, do not specifically address the necessary action of warning the suspect before using deadly force. For instance, arresting the suspect immediately may not be feasible or safe, especially in a high-stakes situation. Using verbal commands could be part of the warning process but does not specifically encapsulate the requirement to warn. Calling for backup is also an important action but is not a direct substitute for the responsibility to warn the suspect. Thus, the act of warning becomes the correct focus when determining the feasibility of using deadly force in these circumstances.