Which driving type is generally considered a lower priority and does not require lights or sirens?

The reason the choice of non-emergency driving is significant is that it represents a situation where the response is not urgent and does not pose an immediate threat to life or property. This type of driving is typically conducted under normal traffic laws, meaning that officers can proceed without using lights or sirens.

In contrast, emergency driving involves responding to incidents requiring immediate action, such as accidents, crimes in progress, or medical emergencies, where using sirens and lights is essential to alert other road users. Pursuits specifically involve chasing a fleeing suspect, which inherently requires a higher level of urgency and the use of lights and sirens to inform other drivers of the emergency situation. Reckless driving generally refers to dangerous driving behaviors that pose a risk to public safety, and while police may respond to this behavior, it also requires a prioritized response with lights and sirens.

Thus, non-emergency driving stands apart as a situation where there is no immediate need for special alerts, making it the correct choice.